It's not the bushiri - latest court ruling. Translated from Dutch to English - tried to clean it up a little. Again - would not be shown as a comfort inn
if developed by this group.
Attachment removed Bushiri
5 Nov, 2010, 14:25 (GMT -04:00) November 5, 2010, 14:25 (GMT -04:00)
Email dit artikel Email this article
Print this article
. The seizure of the Bushiri hotel ordered by the judge lifted.
ORANJESTAD — . ORANGE CITY - Developer Fresnos / Trusam Bushiri must be completed at the hotel lift. This court decided yesterday in the lawsuit by the Aruban government and Baron Investment was brought.
According to the verdict shows the U.S. government and the developer with whom they are in negotiations to acquire the hotel Bushiri their right to the batter to raise. There is no question of a binding agreement that is signed by the parties, called the Aruban government and Fresnos / Trusam. The Spanish group has drawn up the 2007 lease agreement was never signed.This may require no supply of land through a seizure, said the judge. Fresnos / Trusam indicated that although during treatment, although they had not signed the lease agreement, there is continuous contact with the Aruban government until December 2009, something the government also denies.According to one developer had gone so far that in September 2009 an agreement in principle between the Aruban government, Fresnos / Trusam, Aruba Ports Authority (APA) and hotel chain Sol Melia on the table.
Container Port in 2007 offered the lease agreement obviously not signed, in anticipation that the government would provide clarity about how to move the container port of Aruba Ports Authority (APA), which is adjacent to the hotel. Fresnos / Trusam container port would not have, right next to the five-star hotel that the developer wanted to build for the Spanish chain Sol Melia. In addition, a portion of the site where the container port, hotel grounds are. Fresnos / Trusam According to the court itself indicated the offer of the Government to sign the lease agreement is still not to have accepted. Self said Fresnos / Trusam also not a new condition for the potential signing of the lease agreement. There was, said the court, and therefore no agreement has Fresnos / Trusam no entitlement to the land lease. Incidentally, the verdict that there is no evidence that the country prior to the auction had given assurances that the container port would be moved. Fresnos / Trusam had however been argued in its correspondence with the Aruban government and during the session, through attorney David Kock. The judge indicates that the text of the quotes from 2006 where Fresnos / Trusam participated and finally as the winner of the award came from the bus, the removal of the container port to Barcadera intention merely indicated.
Fresnos / Trusam claimed in court that the Aruban government agreement in principle in September 2009 would still sign it. The judge rejected this by hand, given that neither party has signed and that Fresnos / Trusam no form of agreement on the content of the agreement by the parties concerned could provide. The new Tourism Minister, after the change of government would not sign the agreement and also pointed to the APA manual. The text of the agreement also shows that not Fresnos / Trusam entitled to any delivery of the government.