![]() |
|
| Airlines & Airfares Discuss all the ways you can travel to Aruba |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Aruba since 1979
Moderator Join Date: May 2007
Location: renaissance island, eagle beach, amsterdam manor/passions beach bar, Hung Paradis, alto vista chapel, madam janettes, big porch at B55
Posts: 13,258
Images: 80
|
3-1-1 from travel columnist at MSNBC.com
Liquid rules: So long, 3-1-1?
Air travelers say TSA security restrictions no longer in effect By Christopher Elliott Travel columnist msnbc.com contributor updated 10:05 a.m. ET, Mon., May 10, 2010 Christopher Elliott Travel columnist • Profile The Transportation Security Administration’s unpopular restrictions on liquids, gels and aerosols in carry-on luggage — better known as the 3-1-1 rule — are history. Passengers say the TSA has all but stopped screening their baggage for liquids. They say transportation security officers no longer ask them to remove lotions, shampoos and even water bottles from their luggage, and overlook all manner of liquids packed in their carry-ons during screening. “I was never asked about the liquids in my bag or asked to remove them,” says Doris Casamento, a retiree from Naples, Fla., who recently flew from Miami to Rome. “My husband had a bottle of water from the hotel he forgot was in his carry-on and it was never confiscated. The water was in a shallow shoulder-bag bulging practically in plain sight.” Story continues below ↓ advertisement | your ad here The TSA initially banned liquids and gels from carry-on bags in 2006 when British authorities reportedly thwarted a plot to blow up planes bound for the United States with liquid explosives. The rule was later revised to allow small quantities of liquids in carry-ons. The agency in 2008 promised it would ease its restrictions within a year by removing size limits on liquids carried onboard. But liquids still would have to be placed in a separate bin, according to the agency. The 3-1-1 rule isn’t scheduled to be lifted until the end of this year, when X-Ray machines at security checkpoints will have upgraded software proven to detect threat liquids in any configuration. But a TSA spokeswoman insisted the 3-1-1 rule is still in effect. “The policy continues to be enforced,” says the TSA’s Lauren Gaches. “Although it is important to note that we empower our workforce with discretion.” However, extensive interviews with air travelers suggest that the policy is largely unenforced. Among their observations: Vote and share your stories What do you think about TSA's liquid security rules? Too strict Not strict enough Not bothered by the rules, it forces me to pack lighter This feature requires a profile. Create a new profile or sign in to comment. Enter your e-mail address and password to log in. E-mail: Password: Submit The policy was apparently loosened in 2009. Numerous travelers say the TSA started looking the other way last year. “I leave my liquids in my bag about one-third of the time, mostly because I’m brain dead after teaching two or three full days, and forget,” says Gary Zeune, who offers seminars on white-collar crime. “The last time TSA told me to remove the liquids and rescreen the bag was maybe a year ago.” It’s happening across the board. With only one or two exceptions, travelers report the lack of a liquid rule at airports across the country. “Twice lately I have gone through security and in a rush forgot to take out my little baggie of liquids,” says Dody Viola, a social worker in Ann Arbor, Mich. “I didn’t realize this until I was on board the plane. I’m not trying to test the system — I just honestly forgot.” No liquids are suspect. Incredibly, no liquids of any kind are apparently scrutinized by the TSA, according to air travelers. “I have small bottle of hand sanitizer and contact solution in my soft-sided briefcase,” says Robert Muncy, a network engineer in Cincinnati. “Never once have they said anything.” It’s A Snap! See the latest entries See the amazing images sent by msnbc.com readers and submit your own for next week! View the latest contest winner and take the quiz Participate in our weekly photo contest If the 3-1-1 rule has indeed been scrapped, it would mean the TSA has taken a lead in removing the liquid-and-gel restrictions. The European Union last month set an April 29, 2013 deadline for lifting its liquid rules. By that date, the current restrictions on the carriage of liquids in cabin baggage will end, according to a statement issued by Siim Kallas, the EU commission vice president in charge of transport. “For passengers, the aim is also to simplify wherever possible the necessary security controls,” he added. Of course, the Mexicans are a step ahead of all of us when it comes to liberating carry-on liquids. Consider this sign spotted a few days ago at the Puerto Vallarta airport. That’s right, carry your latte right through the checkpoint and take it home to the States with you. “If it’s safe for me to clear security and then fly from Puerto Vallarta to San Francisco with a liquid-filled Venti-sized container that is about seven times the size of the largest allowable toiletry, then why is it not OK for me to do the same from San Francisco to Chicago?” wonders Tony D’Astolfo, who authored the post. Slide show Awful airlines An editorial cartoon roundup by Daryl Cagle depicting the trials and tribulations of air travel. I hear that. I’ve never understood why the TSA had a liquid-and-gel rule, which I’ve openly questioned in previous columns. In response to my claim that liquids were harmless, my friends at the TSA posted a “mythbusting” rebuttal that required its own mythbusting. Isn’t it time for the TSA come clean about liquids? If there’s any evidence that my tube of Crest is dangerous, or even just a single documented case in which liquids could have brought down a plane, then I think we’ll all quietly empty our toothpaste, hair gel and contact lens solution into one quart-sized, clear plastic, zip-top bag. Otherwise, the TSA should make it official and let our liquids fly. |
|
|
|
| ADVERTISMENT | |
![]() | |
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 12
|
Until something is posted oficially from TSA - I'll go the conservative route and follow the insane rule; simply because there have been several times that I really did forget and lost some rather hard to find expensive products. It's frustrating no doubt, but I seem to always be the one that gets "caught" with the dangerous tube of Crest or the bottle of water I always seem to want to carry with me with I travel.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 415
|
That was an interesting article, Andrea.
Was it just a month ago we vacationed in Aruba? Seems longer. Anyway, before we got in line at security the morning of departure, we asked our son and his friends, (four 18 yr olds) to make sure they had their 3-1-1 bags either out or in a pocket where they could easily reach it. My son couldn't find his. I also went through his carry-on and couldn't find it either. Darn...he was carrying our emergency sunscreen supply and a few other liquids in case our checked bag didn't make it. We went through security without any issues. Our checked bag made it to Aruba with us, so all was well. A couple of days after arriving in Aruba, I was looking for something in his carry-on, and sure enough, just as if it had appeared from thin air, there was his 3-1-1 bag. It had made it straight through security.
__________________
No Shirt, No Shoes, No Problem Next Aruba trip in Loving Aruba Since Honeymoon 1984
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | |
|
Moderator
|
Quote:
, but if I did, I am also not brave enough to take a chance .With my luck I would be the one singled out in line and have all my stuff tossed in the garbage. ![]() Right now the 3-1-1 rule is still listed at tsa.gov. I'll go by their rules until they take it down.
__________________
Aruba Bound! ~ Blogging to Aruba ~ Hoosier Kitties ~ Our-Cruises ~ Pictures of Aruba ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Aruba since 1979
Moderator Join Date: May 2007
Location: renaissance island, eagle beach, amsterdam manor/passions beach bar, Hung Paradis, alto vista chapel, madam janettes, big porch at B55
Posts: 13,258
Images: 80
|
*** i am not advising folks to ignore the rule******
i was just making this article available as "interesting" reading. we haven't flown since february. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |
|
Moderator
|
Quote:
__________________
Aruba Bound! ~ Blogging to Aruba ~ Hoosier Kitties ~ Our-Cruises ~ Pictures of Aruba ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Arikok
Antilla
Natural pool
Posts: 1,226
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) | |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 40
|
Quote:
You and me both!
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| carry on |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:58 AM.












, but if I did, I am also not brave enough to take a chance
I would be the one singled out in line and have all my stuff tossed in the garbage. 

/201205260000_7.gif)

