Aruba Beach
Aruba Nights Island Guide
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 23 of 23
Like Tree2Likes

Thread: Bird Sanctuary "development"

  1. #21
    CK1
    CK1 is offline
    Senior Member CK1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Anywhere where I can see the turquoise-blue ocean
    Posts
    2,285
    Not good...

    Google Translation

    RBM: Government promised Bubali land and must now deliver

    Posted on 23/06/2016 2:24 pm AST | Updated on 6/23/2016 2:27 pm AST

    ORANJESTAD -. The decision of 7 June, in the case which the Aruba Birdlife Conservation has filed against the Aruban government has serious implications for the developer RBM Estates (owners Misier and Acosta), especially for the project Las Olas. This formed the basis for a case filed Wednesday morning in court. The government seemed in this case to have made a 180 degree turn with respect to the previous case and RBM practically drop by setting than 'one had to have patience and to wait until they would have been actual site. The reason given was that the 'adaptation' of the Spatial Development Plan (ROP) will still take some time. In the meantime, developers can not 'assume' that they no longer get a commitment, although there is indeed "earlier commitments made.

    ARGUMENTS BY RBM ESTATES

    RBM Estates has filed the case to have the opportunity to represent their interests because they were not a party to the earlier case between ABC and the government and were not even aware of the case. Lawyer Geoffrey Weaver argued that RBM Estates has met during a long journey all conditions and therefore must get the land lease, "But if the verdict of June 7 is maintained, the government can not do this without paying a penalty. "During the examination of the case showed that the developers constantly have been in contact with both the responsible minister (Sevinger) and DIP (Departamento di Infra Trick Tura y Planificacion). The lawyer told the court further that the Minister has said he wants to change the ROP and the site wants to give another destination (not a 'green' area).

    GREEN AREA?

    According to RBM Estates is not necessary to have a discussion on whether the site is green or not, because of information they would appear to have the site just adjacent to a green zone, namely the Bubali Plas. The property itself would have no green destination. The developers rely on the principle of equality in order to obtain the land lease. According to Weaver, it is also that the project will be developed in the interests of the government, because it delivers tourist 'spin'. The option on the property is indeed expired, that RBM also recognized, but it has received a commitment that the option will be extended for at least 6 months. "We have not yet received it, because DIP has given us notice that they have not been able to make by lack of staff."

    SURPRISING OTHER GOVERNMENT INSTALLATIONS

    The government has surprised everyone when lawyer Sjiem Fat declared that the claim does have RBM on the field is not valid. This government seems to be drawing 180 degrees to have turned. Fat Sjiem also said that the government is bound by the ROP: something that has denied the government in the previous case. At this time, the field in accordance with the state of the lawyer still "green", so that it can not be issued for development. RBM should have according to the government, please. Is to be viewed, or the field may still be issued in the future, and then it would be possible to provide an option. "But not yet." According Sjiem Fat is the intention that the government will change the destiny of the area as economically more eggeven priority will be to develop and there are enough grounds are protected. But we are not there yet. esey

    DEFENCE ABC

    The lawyer for ABC, Geert Rep was very surprised about the different arrangement of the (lawyer) government. "We expected a tough battle," the lawyer told NoticiaCla.com. It was for him a pleasant surprise to see this other attitude of the government, which they have made mistakes and indicated not to be the ROP breaking now plan and only later will raise this issue on the agenda. "The area now has a green destination and if one is going to change, we will fight again," said Rep in talks with NoticiaCla.com. Rep for the judge stated that although he noted the good intentions of the government now, he continues to insist that one can not spend on the project site, not optional nor lease.

    http://www.noticiacla.com/news/6335

  2. #22
    CK1
    CK1 is offline
    Senior Member CK1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Anywhere where I can see the turquoise-blue ocean
    Posts
    2,285
    RBM Estates NV does third opposition verdict Bubali areas

    Posted on 06/21/2016 10:41 am AST | Updated on 6/21/2016 10:41 am AST

    ORANJESTAD - The company RBM Estates NV is contesting the verdict that the court has recently pointed out in the case brought by the Foundation Aruba Birdlife Conservation at the Country. Lawyer Geoffrey Weaver Cuba firm De Wever has confirmed this to NoticiaCla.com. It is a so-called "third resistance", said the lawyer, against the judgment of 7 June last. The judge forbade this ruling the government of Aruba to issue leasehold land and has also banned the development of three areas of Bubali designated as "green areas".

    BUSINESS SUFFERS INJURY

    RBM Estates NV suffers damage by this statement because it is one of the companies developing projects in these fields. It concerns in this case the project known as "Las Olas" said the lawyer, "They are part of a group that invests a lot and has already invested in several large projects in Aruba." "We have registered a third-party proceedings because RBM Estates NV damage suffered by the ruling of June 7, while RBM Estates SA was not a party and was not aware of the case and therefore could not defend in the case, "says the lawyer," We think it's important that the court also hears the side of RBM Estates NV ". Both the Foundation Aruba Birdlife Conservation and Land Aruba will be heard in this case and to defend their interests in the occasion. This week the matter will be submitted to the court in Aruba.

    THE JUDGMENT OF 7 JUNE

    The court made a ruling on June 7 that the government ban was imposed grounds to issue leasehold and was instructed to adhere to the ROP (Spatial Development), as established in 2009. Building hotels on the conscious areas, according to the court violates the ROP. The grounds are indeed regarded as 'green', so to build it prohibited them and develop them. The court took the view in this case that the government should adhere to the ROP in the management of domain lands and issuing land lease. In any event, there are compelling reasons must be when there are deviations from the ROP. The government could not establish in the present case why had departed from the ROP. By land to spend a long lease and leave bare sweep for development, the government has acted contrary to the ROP. The aim of Aruba Birdlife Conservation (ABC) with the lawsuit was to ensure that green areas would be issued for the development of hotels.

    http://www.noticiacla.com/news/6301

  3. #23
    Senior Member arubabob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Eagle Beach, Baby Beach, Arashi Beach Tierra Del Sol golf course
    Posts
    1,202
    There is no need to construct anything on the bird sanctuary. there is an enormous amount of undeveloped cactus garden on the island.

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO